On 2011-06-12 19:42, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 11 June 2011 10:05, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de> wrote: >> @@ -2074,6 +2074,7 @@ int load_vmstate(const char *name) >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> >> + qemu_system_reset(); >> ret = qemu_loadvm_state(f); > > This means that if we're doing a load because the user > passed -loadvm on the command line we'll end up doing > qemu_system_reset() twice (once in vl.c and then again > here). Does that matter?
I don't think it's worth optimizing. E.g. we already reset every PCI device twice during normal reset. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
