On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:23:31 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote:

> From: Denis Plotnikov <dplotni...@virtuozzo.com>
> 
> Since, virtio_seg_max_adjust checks not only seg_max, but also
> virtqueue_size parameter, let's make the test more general and
> add new parameters to be checked there in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Plotnikov <dplotni...@virtuozzo.com>
> Message-Id: <20200129140702.5411-5-dplotni...@virtuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../{virtio_seg_max_adjust.py => virtio_check_params.py}          | 0
>  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  rename tests/acceptance/{virtio_seg_max_adjust.py => virtio_check_params.py} 
> (100%)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/virtio_seg_max_adjust.py 
> b/tests/acceptance/virtio_check_params.py
> similarity index 100%
> rename from tests/acceptance/virtio_seg_max_adjust.py
> rename to tests/acceptance/virtio_check_params.py

Makes sense, especially if we want to add non-blk/scsi checks in there.

Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>


Reply via email to