On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 9:35 AM Mark Cave-Ayland < mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote:
> On 31/01/2020 08:03, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > >> Thank you for testing the two patches. I will wait a few days to see if > Zoltán wants to write a cleaned up patch. Otherwise I'll try to write a > patch that's acceptable for submission. > > > > I'm busy collecting pending audio fixes for the next pull req, > > planned to send out early next week. Would be cool if I can > > include a coreaudio fix ;) > > > > The RFC patch looks sane to me but it clearly needs a better > > commit message. > > > > Current patch queue state: > > https://git.kraxel.org/cgit/qemu/log/?h=queue/audio > > > > If I missed something please resend. > > That would be great! One thing to note is that Volker's RFC patch applies > on top of > Zoltan's original diff from > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-01/msg02142.html > rather than > being standalone. > > If you take a look at my branch at > https://github.com/mcayland/qemu/commits/for-cat7 > then it's just a case of squashing the top 2 commits and coming up with a > suitable > commit message. > > > ATB, > > Mark. > Yes, lovely! I just applied the dsound patch from KJ Liew on top of the for-cat7 branch. https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-01/msg03805.html While it will not apply directly (not finding the file to patch in the source tree), it nevertheless gets rid of the dsound errors too. Best, Howard
