On 2/1/20 8:06 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 31/01/2020 22.11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
As we want to re-use this code, extract it as a new function.
Since we are using the PL011 serial console, add a Avocado tag
to ease filtering of tests.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
---
  tests/acceptance/machine_arm_integratorcp.py | 16 ++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/acceptance/machine_arm_integratorcp.py 
b/tests/acceptance/machine_arm_integratorcp.py
index 4f9ab40f2f..748819916d 100644
--- a/tests/acceptance/machine_arm_integratorcp.py
+++ b/tests/acceptance/machine_arm_integratorcp.py
@@ -19,12 +19,7 @@ class IntegratorMachine(Test):
timeout = 90 - @skipUnless(os.getenv('AVOCADO_ALLOW_UNTRUSTED_CODE'), 'untrusted code')
-    def test_integratorcp(self):
-        """
-        :avocado: tags=arch:arm
-        :avocado: tags=machine:integratorcp
-        """
+    def boot_integratorcp(self):
          kernel_url = ('https://github.com/zayac/qemu-arm/raw/master/'
                        'arm-test/kernel/zImage.integrator')
          kernel_hash = '0d7adba893c503267c946a3cbdc63b4b54f25468'
@@ -40,4 +35,13 @@ class IntegratorMachine(Test):
                           '-initrd', initrd_path,
                           '-append', 'printk.time=0 console=ttyAMA0')

I wonder whether you might want to move the "console=ttyAMA0" to the
test_integratorcp(), too, to get the text in the framebuffer in the
second test instead?

This is not a test, but a common method used by both tests, so both use it.


          self.vm.launch()
+
+    @skipUnless(os.getenv('AVOCADO_ALLOW_UNTRUSTED_CODE'), 'untrusted code')
+    def test_integratorcp(self):
+        """
+        :avocado: tags=arch:arm
+        :avocado: tags=machine:integratorcp
+        :avocado: tags=device:pl011
+        """
+        self.boot_integratorcp()
          wait_for_console_pattern(self, 'Log in as root')


Anyway, patch looks fine,

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>

Thanks!

Peter, Thomas previous patch and these series are reviewed. Can you queue them in your target-arm.next tree?


Reply via email to