On 06/19/2011 08:00 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.06.2011, at 18:04, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/19/2011 06:53 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 19.06.2011 um 17:46 schrieb Avi Kivity:
>>
>>> On 06/19/2011 06:22 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>> I wonder if this will break non-Linux platforms. Perhaps buffer an
>>>> entire row of pixels instead and only fwrite(3) at the end of the
>>>> outer loop.
>>>
>>> That's how I wrote this in the first place. Since the consensus is
against these functions, I'll submit that version instead.
>>
>> Maybe add a qemu_fputc_unlocked() and do a configure check for it?
>
> Good idea. I'll try that, unless people disagree.
Writing by row should be faster and pretty straight forward, no?
I don't see how it's faster, but I guess I'll do that, it's a local
issue and is best addressed locally.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
