On 2/17/20 11:35 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
This series copies the files syscall.tbl from linux v5.5 and generates the file syscall_nr.h from them.
[...]
Laurent Vivier (22): linux-user: introduce parameters to generate syscall_nr.h linux-user,alpha: add syscall table generation support linux-user,hppa: add syscall table generation support linux-user,m68k: add syscall table generation support linux-user,xtensa: add syscall table generation support linux-user,sh4: add syscall table generation support linux-user,microblaze: add syscall table generation support linux-user,arm: add syscall table generation support linux-user,ppc: split syscall_nr.h linux-user,ppc: add syscall table generation support linux-user,s390x: remove syscall definitions for !TARGET_S390X linux-user,s390x: add syscall table generation support linux-user,sparc,sparc64: add syscall table generation support linux-user,i386: add syscall table generation support linux-user,x86_64: add syscall table generation support linux-user,mips: add syscall table generation support linux-user,mips64: split syscall_nr.h linux-user,mips64: add syscall table generation support linux-user,scripts: add a script to update syscall.tbl linux-user: update syscall.tbl from linux 0bf999f9c5e7 linux-user,mips: move content of mips_syscall_args linux-user,mips: update syscall-args-o32.c.inc
I suppose the patch subject was generated and you meant to use "linux-user/" instead of "linux-user,". Is that right?
