On 17/02/2020 18:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
No reason to use _locked version of bdrv_enable_dirty_bitmap, as we
don't lock this mutex before. Moreover, the adjacent
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enable_successor do lock the mutex.

Fixes: 58f72b965e9e1q
Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org # v3.0
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
---
  migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
index 7eafface61..16f1793ee3 100644
--- a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ void dirty_bitmap_mig_before_vm_start(void)
          DirtyBitmapLoadBitmapState *b = item->data;
if (b->migrated) {
-            bdrv_enable_dirty_bitmap_locked(b->bitmap);
+            bdrv_enable_dirty_bitmap(b->bitmap);
          } else {
              bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enable_successor(b->bitmap);
          }


Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkev...@virtuozzo.com>
--
With the best regards,
Andrey Shinkevich

Reply via email to