Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 16:22, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> We are converting more doc files to *.rst rather than *.texi. Most >> doc files are already listed early in diffs due to our catchall >> docs/*, but a few top-level files get missed by that glob. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> >> --- >> >> Both *.texi and *.rst entries make sense while we are still converting >> things, but we'll need a followup to drop *.texi when the conversion >> is complete... > > I was wondering what rst files we had outside docs, and > the answer is "README.rst, CODING_STYLE.rst and > tests/acceptance/README.rst". > > (There's a reasonable argument for moving CODING_STYLE.rst to > docs/devel now; depends how highly you rate having it more > "discoverable" to new contributors.)
The little cynic in the back of my head cackles and points out that CODING_STYLE.rst exists not for new contributors to discover, but so that old contributors have something to smack on new heads. SCNR :)
