Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:46 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> I tried to observe the main loop keeps running while the screendump does
>> its work.
>>
>> The main loop appears to lack trace points.  Alright, if there's no
>> hammer handy, I'll use a rock:
>>
>> diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c
>> index 5549f4b619..b6561a65d7 100644
>> --- a/softmmu/vl.c
>> +++ b/softmmu/vl.c
>> @@ -1661,6 +1661,7 @@ void qemu_main_loop(void)
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROFILER
>>          ti = profile_getclock();
>>  #endif
>> +        printf("*** main loop\n");
>>          main_loop_wait(false);
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROFILER
>>          dev_time += profile_getclock() - ti;
>>
>>
>> First experiment: does the main loop continue to run when writing out
>> the screendump blocks / would block?
>>
>> Observe qmp_screendump() opens the file without O_EXCL.  Great, that
>> lets me block output by making it open a FIFO.
>>
>> Terminal#1:
>>
>>     $ mkfifo s
>>
>> Terminal#2:
>>
>>     $ upstream-qemu -S -display none -chardev 
>> socket,id=qmp,path=test-qmp,server=on,wait=off -mon mode=control,chardev=qmp
>>     *** main loop
>>     *** main loop
>>     *** main loop
>>
>> Keeps printing at a steady pace.
>>
>> Terminal#3:
>>
>>     $ socat "READLINE,history=$HOME/.qmp_history,prompt=QMP>" 
>> UNIX-CONNECT:$HOME/work/images/test-qmp
>>     {"QMP": {"version": {"qemu": {"micro": 50, "minor": 2, "major": 4}, 
>> "package": "v4.2.0-2069-g5e5ae6b644-dirty"}, "capabilities": ["oob"]}}
>>     QMP>{"execute": "qmp_capabilities"}
>>     {"return": {}}
>>     QMP>{"execute": "screendump", "arguments": {"filename": "s"}}
>>
>> The printing in terminal#2 stops.  This is expected; qemu_open() calls
>> open(), which blocks, because the FIFO has no reader.
>>
>> Terminal#1:
>>
>>     $ exec 4<s
>>
>> Now the FIFO has a reader.  Terminal#2 remains quiet.
>>
>> We now hang in ppm_save().  Abridged stack backtrace:
>>
>>     #0  0x00007ffff519d0f5 in writev () at /lib64/libc.so.6
>>     #1  0x0000555555e15f61 in qio_channel_file_writev
>>         (ioc=0x5555567bf5f0, iov=0x555556a441b0, niov=1, fds=0x0, nfds=0, 
>> errp=0x7fffe9d81d10) at /work/armbru/qemu/io/channel-file.c:123
>>     #2  0x0000555555e133d3 in qio_channel_writev_full
>>         (ioc=0x5555567bf5f0, iov=0x555556a441b0, niov=1, fds=0x0, nfds=0, 
>> errp=0x7fffe9d81d10) at /work/armbru/qemu/io/channel.c:86
>>     #3  0x0000555555e137a2 in qio_channel_writev
>>         (ioc=0x5555567bf5f0, iov=0x555556a441b0, niov=1, errp=0x7fffe9d81d10)
>>         at /work/armbru/qemu/io/channel.c:207
>>     #4  0x0000555555e13696 in qio_channel_writev_all
>>         (ioc=0x5555567bf5f0, iov=0x7fffe9d81bd0, niov=1, errp=0x7fffe9d81d10)
>>         at /work/armbru/qemu/io/channel.c:171
>>     #5  0x0000555555e139b1 in qio_channel_write_all
>>         (ioc=0x5555567bf5f0, buf=0x555556b05200 "", buflen=1920, 
>> errp=0x7fffe9d81d10) at /work/armbru/qemu/io/channel.c:257
>>     #6  0x0000555555cd74ff in ppm_save
>>         (fd=22, image=0x5555568ffdd0, errp=0x7fffe9d81d10)
>>         at /work/armbru/qemu/ui/console.c:336
>>     #7  0x0000555555cd77e6 in qmp_screendump
>>         (filename=0x555556ea0900 "s", has_device=false, device=0x0, 
>> has_head=false, head=0, errp=0x7fffe9d81d10) at 
>> /work/armbru/qemu/ui/console.c:401
>>
>> A brief inspection of qio_channel_file_writev() and
>> qio_channel_writev_all() suggests this might work if you make the output
>> file descriptor non-blocking.
>
> Right, the goal was rather originally to fix rhbz#1230527. We got
> coroutine IO by accident, and I was too optimistic about default
> behaviour change ;) I will update the patch.
>
>>
>>     $ head -c 1 <&4 | hexdump -C
>>     00000000  50                                                |P|
>>     00000001
>>
>> Still quiet.
>>
>>     $ cat <&4 >/dev/null
>>
>> The printing resumes.
>>
>>     $ exec 4<&-
>>
>>
>> Second experiment: does the main loop continue to run while we wait for
>> graphic_hw_update_done()?
>>
>> Left as an exercise for the patch submitter ;)
>>
>>
>
> With your main loop printf, one printf in graphic_hw_update() and one
> in graphic_hw_update_done() ? (rather part of testing commit
> 4d6316218bf7bf3b8c7c7165b072cc314511a7a7, soon 4y old!)

We might also need to artificially delay graphic_hw_update_done().


Reply via email to