Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabb...@google.com> writes:

> I think, more concretely, the issues here are:
>
> * The only mention of "semihosting" in the RISC-V specification is in the
>   commentary, which is not considered a normative part of the
> specification.

Ok, we're starting the process of creating a 'real' RISC-V semihosting
spec. This references the existing 2.0 version of the ARM semihosting
specification, defining only the RISC-V specific details necessary.
I've created a public github repository containing this work; that is
likely to eventually move over to the RISC-V github repository.

        https://github.com/keith-packard/riscv-semihosting-spec/

The goal is to enable RISC-V semihosting implementations that share most
of the underlying details with existing ARM semihosting implemenations.

-- 
-keith

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to