On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:20:21PM +0000, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > From: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 1:32 AM
> > To: Liu, Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/22] intel_iommu: add PASID cache management
> > infrastructure
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:36:09AM -0700, Liu Yi L wrote:
> > > This patch adds a PASID cache management infrastructure based on new
> > > added structure VTDPASIDAddressSpace, which is used to track the PASID
> > > usage and future PASID tagged DMA address translation support in
> > > vIOMMU.
> > >
> > > struct VTDPASIDAddressSpace {
> > > VTDBus *vtd_bus;
> > > uint8_t devfn;
> > > AddressSpace as;
> > > uint32_t pasid;
> > > IntelIOMMUState *iommu_state;
> > > VTDContextCacheEntry context_cache_entry;
> > > QLIST_ENTRY(VTDPASIDAddressSpace) next;
> > > VTDPASIDCacheEntry pasid_cache_entry;
> > > };
> > >
> > > Ideally, a VTDPASIDAddressSpace instance is created when a PASID is
> > > bound with a DMA AddressSpace. Intel VT-d spec requires guest software
> > > to issue pasid cache invalidation when bind or unbind a pasid with an
> > > address space under caching-mode. However, as VTDPASIDAddressSpace
> > > instances also act as pasid cache in this implementation, its creation
> > > also happens during vIOMMU PASID tagged DMA translation. The creation
> > > in this path will not be added in this patch since no PASID-capable
> > > emulated devices for now.
> > >
> > > The implementation in this patch manages VTDPASIDAddressSpace
> > > instances per PASID+BDF (lookup and insert will use PASID and
> > > BDF) since Intel VT-d spec allows per-BDF PASID Table. When a guest
> > > bind a PASID with an AddressSpace, QEMU will capture the guest pasid
> > > selective pasid cache invalidation, and allocate remove a
> > > VTDPASIDAddressSpace instance per the invalidation
> > > reasons:
> > >
> > > *) a present pasid entry moved to non-present
> > > *) a present pasid entry to be a present entry
> > > *) a non-present pasid entry moved to present
> > >
> > > vIOMMU emulator could figure out the reason by fetching latest guest
> > > pasid entry.
> > >
> > > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Yi Sun <yi.y....@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>
> > > Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 394
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 14 ++
> > > hw/i386/trace-events | 1 +
> > > include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 33 +++-
> > > 4 files changed, 441 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c index
> > > 1daeab2..c985cae 100644
> > > --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> > > +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> > > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> > > #include "kvm_i386.h"
> > > #include "migration/vmstate.h"
> > > #include "trace.h"
> > > +#include "qemu/jhash.h"
> > >
> > > /* context entry operations */
> > > #define VTD_CE_GET_RID2PASID(ce) \
> > > @@ -65,6 +66,8 @@
> > > static void vtd_address_space_refresh_all(IntelIOMMUState *s);
> > > static void vtd_address_space_unmap(VTDAddressSpace *as, IOMMUNotifier
> > > *n);
> > >
> > > +static void vtd_pasid_cache_reset(IntelIOMMUState *s);
> > > +
> > > static void vtd_panic_require_caching_mode(void)
> > > {
> > > error_report("We need to set caching-mode=on for intel-iommu to
> > > enable "
> > > @@ -276,6 +279,7 @@ static void vtd_reset_caches(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> > > vtd_iommu_lock(s);
> > > vtd_reset_iotlb_locked(s);
> > > vtd_reset_context_cache_locked(s);
> > > + vtd_pasid_cache_reset(s);
> > > vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -686,6 +690,11 @@ static inline bool vtd_pe_type_check(X86IOMMUState
> > *x86_iommu,
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline uint16_t vtd_pe_get_domain_id(VTDPASIDEntry *pe) {
> > > + return VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_DID((pe)->val[1]);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static inline bool vtd_pdire_present(VTDPASIDDirEntry *pdire) {
> > > return pdire->val & 1;
> > > @@ -2395,19 +2404,402 @@ static bool
> > vtd_process_iotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s, VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline void vtd_init_pasid_key(uint32_t pasid,
> > > + uint16_t sid,
> > > + struct pasid_key *key) {
> > > + key->pasid = pasid;
> > > + key->sid = sid;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static guint vtd_pasid_as_key_hash(gconstpointer v) {
> > > + struct pasid_key *key = (struct pasid_key *)v;
> > > + uint32_t a, b, c;
> > > +
> > > + /* Jenkins hash */
> > > + a = b = c = JHASH_INITVAL + sizeof(*key);
> > > + a += key->sid;
> > > + b += extract32(key->pasid, 0, 16);
> > > + c += extract32(key->pasid, 16, 16);
> > > +
> > > + __jhash_mix(a, b, c);
> > > + __jhash_final(a, b, c);
> > > +
> > > + return c;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static gboolean vtd_pasid_as_key_equal(gconstpointer v1,
> > > +gconstpointer v2) {
> > > + const struct pasid_key *k1 = v1;
> > > + const struct pasid_key *k2 = v2;
> > > +
> > > + return (k1->pasid == k2->pasid) && (k1->sid == k2->sid); }
> > > +
> > > +static inline int vtd_dev_get_pe_from_pasid(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> > > + uint8_t bus_num,
> > > + uint8_t devfn,
> > > + uint32_t pasid,
> > > + VTDPASIDEntry *pe) {
> > > + VTDContextEntry ce;
> > > + int ret;
> > > + dma_addr_t pasid_dir_base;
> > > +
> > > + if (!s->root_scalable) {
> > > + return -VTD_FR_PASID_TABLE_INV;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = vtd_dev_to_context_entry(s, bus_num, devfn, &ce);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + pasid_dir_base = VTD_CE_GET_PASID_DIR_TABLE(&ce);
> > > + ret = vtd_get_pe_from_pasid_table(s,
> > > + pasid_dir_base, pasid, pe);
> >
> > The indents across the series are still strange... Take this one as
> > example, nornally
> > I'll indent at the left bracket if I want to use another newline:
> >
> > ret = vtd_get_pe_from_pasid_table(s, pasid_dir_base,
> > pasid, pe);
> >
> > And here actually you don't need a new line at all because it's only
> > 70 chars...
> >
> > I don't think it's a must (I am always not sure whether we should be that
> > strict on all
> > these), but it should be preferred if you change all the similar places
> > with the same
> > indentation as the existing code.
>
> Sure, I'll have a double check on it.
>
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool vtd_pasid_entry_compare(VTDPASIDEntry *p1, VTDPASIDEntry
> > > +*p2) {
> > > + return !memcmp(p1, p2, sizeof(*p1)); }
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * This function cached the pasid entry in &vtd_pasid_as. Also
> > > + * notifies host about the new pasid binding. Caller of this
> > > + * function should hold iommu_lock.
> > > + */
> > > +static inline void vtd_fill_in_pe_in_cache(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> > > + VTDPASIDAddressSpace
> > > *vtd_pasid_as,
> > > + VTDPASIDEntry *pe) {
> > > + VTDPASIDCacheEntry *pc_entry = &vtd_pasid_as->pasid_cache_entry;
> > > +
> > > + pc_entry->pasid_entry = *pe;
> > > + pc_entry->pasid_cache_gen = s->pasid_cache_gen;
> > > + /*
> > > + * TODO:
> > > + * - send pasid bind to host for passthru devices
> > > + */
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * This function updates the pasid entry cached in &vtd_pasid_as.
> > > + * Caller of this function should hold iommu_lock.
> > > + */
> > > +static void vtd_update_pe_in_cache(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> > > + VTDPASIDAddressSpace *vtd_pasid_as,
> > > + VTDPASIDEntry *pe) {
> > > + VTDPASIDCacheEntry *pc_entry = &vtd_pasid_as->pasid_cache_entry;
> > > +
> > > + if (vtd_pasid_entry_compare(pe, &pc_entry->pasid_entry)) {
> > > + /* No need to go further as cached pasid entry is latest */
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + vtd_fill_in_pe_in_cache(s, vtd_pasid_as, pe); }
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * This function is used to clear pasid_cache_gen of cached pasid
> > > + * entry in vtd_pasid_as instances. Caller of this function should
> > > + * hold iommu_lock.
> > > + */
> > > +static gboolean vtd_flush_pasid(gpointer key, gpointer value,
> > > + gpointer user_data) {
> > > + VTDPASIDCacheInfo *pc_info = user_data;
> > > + VTDPASIDAddressSpace *vtd_pasid_as = value;
> > > + IntelIOMMUState *s = vtd_pasid_as->iommu_state;
> > > + VTDPASIDCacheEntry *pc_entry = &vtd_pasid_as->pasid_cache_entry;
> > > + VTDBus *vtd_bus = vtd_pasid_as->vtd_bus;
> > > + VTDPASIDEntry pe;
> > > + uint16_t did;
> > > + uint32_t pasid;
> > > + uint16_t devfn;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + did = vtd_pe_get_domain_id(&pc_entry->pasid_entry);
> > > + pasid = vtd_pasid_as->pasid;
> > > + devfn = vtd_pasid_as->devfn;
> > > +
> > > + if (!(pc_entry->pasid_cache_gen == s->pasid_cache_gen)) {
> > > + return false;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + switch (pc_info->flags & VTD_PASID_CACHE_INFO_MASK) {
> > > + case VTD_PASID_CACHE_PASIDSI:
> > > + if (pc_info->pasid != pasid) {
> > > + return false;
> > > + }
> > > + /* Fall through */
> > > + case VTD_PASID_CACHE_DOMSI:
> > > + if (pc_info->domain_id != did) {
> > > + return false;
> > > + }
> > > + /* Fall through */
> > > + case VTD_PASID_CACHE_GLOBAL:
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + error_report("invalid pc_info->flags");
> > > + abort();
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * pasid cache invalidation may indicate a present pasid
> > > + * entry to present pasid entry modification. To cover such
> > > + * case, vIOMMU emulator needs to fetch latest guest pasid
> > > + * entry and check cached pasid entry, then update pasid
> > > + * cache and send pasid bind/unbind to host properly.
> > > + */
> > > + ret = vtd_dev_get_pe_from_pasid(s,
> > > + pci_bus_num(vtd_bus->bus), devfn, pasid, &pe);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * No valid pasid entry in guest memory. e.g. pasid entry
> > > + * was modified to be either all-zero or non-present. Either
> > > + * case means existing pasid cache should be removed.
> > > + */
> > > + goto remove;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + vtd_update_pe_in_cache(s, vtd_pasid_as, &pe);
> > > + /*
> > > + * TODO:
> > > + * - when pasid-base-iotlb(piotlb) infrastructure is ready,
> > > + * should invalidate QEMU piotlb togehter with this change.
> > > + */
> > > + return false;
> > > +remove:
> > > + /*
> > > + * TODO:
> > > + * - send pasid bind to host for passthru devices
> > > + * - when pasid-base-iotlb(piotlb) infrastructure is ready,
> > > + * should invalidate QEMU piotlb togehter with this change.
> > > + */
> > > + return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * This function finds or adds a VTDPASIDAddressSpace for a device
> > > + * when it is bound to a pasid. Caller of this function should hold
> > > + * iommu_lock.
> > > + */
> > > +static VTDPASIDAddressSpace *vtd_add_find_pasid_as(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> > > + VTDBus *vtd_bus,
> > > + int devfn,
> > > + uint32_t pasid) {
> > > + struct pasid_key key;
> > > + struct pasid_key *new_key;
> > > + VTDPASIDAddressSpace *vtd_pasid_as;
> > > + uint16_t sid;
> > > +
> > > + sid = vtd_make_source_id(pci_bus_num(vtd_bus->bus), devfn);
> > > + vtd_init_pasid_key(pasid, sid, &key);
> > > + vtd_pasid_as = g_hash_table_lookup(s->vtd_pasid_as, &key);
> > > +
> > > + if (!vtd_pasid_as) {
> > > + new_key = g_malloc0(sizeof(*new_key));
> > > + vtd_init_pasid_key(pasid, sid, new_key);
> > > + /*
> > > + * Initiate the vtd_pasid_as structure.
> > > + *
> > > + * This structure here is used to track the guest pasid
> > > + * binding and also serves as pasid-cache mangement entry.
> > > + *
> > > + * TODO: in future, if wants to support the SVA-aware DMA
> > > + * emulation, the vtd_pasid_as should have include
> > > + * AddressSpace to support DMA emulation.
> > > + */
> > > + vtd_pasid_as = g_malloc0(sizeof(VTDPASIDAddressSpace));
> > > + vtd_pasid_as->iommu_state = s;
> > > + vtd_pasid_as->vtd_bus = vtd_bus;
> > > + vtd_pasid_as->devfn = devfn;
> > > + vtd_pasid_as->context_cache_entry.context_cache_gen = 0;
> > > + vtd_pasid_as->pasid = pasid;
> > > + vtd_pasid_as->pasid_cache_entry.pasid_cache_gen = 0;
> > > + g_hash_table_insert(s->vtd_pasid_as, new_key, vtd_pasid_as);
> > > + }
> > > + return vtd_pasid_as;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int vtd_pasid_cache_dsi(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t
> > > domain_id) {
> > > + VTDPASIDCacheInfo pc_info;
> > > +
> > > + trace_vtd_pasid_cache_dsi(domain_id);
> > > +
> > > + pc_info.flags = VTD_PASID_CACHE_DOMSI;
> > > + pc_info.domain_id = domain_id;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Loop all existing pasid caches and update them.
> > > + */
> > > + vtd_iommu_lock(s);
> > > + g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->vtd_pasid_as,
> > > + vtd_flush_pasid, &pc_info);
> > > + vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * TODO:
> > > + * Domain selective PASID cache invalidation flushes
> > > + * all the pasid caches within a domain. To be safe,
> > > + * after invalidating the pasid caches, emulator needs
> > > + * to replay the pasid bindings by walking guest pasid
> > > + * dir and pasid table. e.g. When the guest setup a new
> > > + * PASID entry then send a PASID DSI.
> > > + */
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int vtd_pasid_cache_psi(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> > > uint16_t domain_id, uint32_t pasid) {
> > > + VTDPASIDCacheInfo pc_info;
> > > + VTDHostIOMMUContext *vtd_dev_icx;
> > > +
> > > + /* PASID selective implies a DID selective */
> > > + pc_info.flags = VTD_PASID_CACHE_PASIDSI;
> > > + pc_info.domain_id = domain_id;
> > > + pc_info.pasid = pasid;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Regards to a pasid selective pasid cache invalidation (PSI),
> > > + * it could be either cases of below:
> > > + * a) a present pasid entry moved to non-present
> > > + * b) a present pasid entry to be a present entry
> > > + * c) a non-present pasid entry moved to present
> > > + *
> > > + * Here the handling of a PSI follows below steps:
> > > + * 1) loop all the exisitng vtd_pasid_as instances to update them
> > > + * according to the latest guest pasid entry in pasid table.
> > > + * this will make sure affected existing vtd_pasid_as instances
> > > + * cached the latest pasid entries. Also, during the loop, the
> > > + * host should be notified if needed. e.g. pasid unbind or pasid
> > > + * update. Should be able to cover case a) and case b).
> > > + *
> > > + * 2) loop all devices to cover case c)
> > > + * - For devices which have HostIOMMUContext instances,
> > > + * we loop them and check if guest pasid entry exists. If yes,
> > > + * it is case c), we update the pasid cache and also notify
> > > + * host.
> > > + * - For devices which have no HostIOMMUContext, it is not
> > > + * necessary to create pasid cache at this phase since it
> > > + * could be created when vIOMMU does DMA address translation.
> > > + * This is not yet implemented since there is no emulated
> > > + * pasid-capable devices today. If we have such devices in
> > > + * future, the pasid cache shall be created there.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > + vtd_iommu_lock(s);
> > > + /* Step 1: loop all the exisitng vtd_pasid_as instances */
> > > + g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->vtd_pasid_as,
> > > + vtd_flush_pasid, &pc_info);
> > > +
> >
> > <START>
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Step 2: loop all the exisitng vtd_dev_icx instances.
> > > + * Ideally, needs to loop all devices to find if there is any new
> > > + * PASID binding regards to the PASID cache invalidation request.
> > > + * But it is enough to loop the devices which are backed by host
> > > + * IOMMU. For devices backed by vIOMMU (a.k.a emulated devices),
> > > + * if new PASID happened on them, their vtd_pasid_as instance could
> > > + * be created during future vIOMMU DMA translation.
> > > + */
> > > + QLIST_FOREACH(vtd_dev_icx, &s->vtd_dev_icx_list, next) {
> > > + VTDPASIDAddressSpace *vtd_pasid_as;
> > > + VTDPASIDCacheEntry *pc_entry;
> > > + VTDPASIDEntry pe;
> > > + VTDBus *vtd_bus = vtd_dev_icx->vtd_bus;
> > > + uint16_t devfn = vtd_dev_icx->devfn;
> > > + int bus_n = pci_bus_num(vtd_bus->bus);
> > > +
> > > + /* i) fetch vtd_pasid_as and check if it is valid */
> > > + vtd_pasid_as = vtd_add_find_pasid_as(s, vtd_bus,
> > > + devfn, pasid);
> >
> > I don't feel like it's correct here...
> >
> > Assuming we have two devices assigned D1, D2. D1 uses PASID=1, D2 uses
> > PASID=2.
> > When invalidating against PASID=1, are you also going to create a
> > VTDPASIDAddressSpace also for D2 with PASID=1?
>
> Answer is no. Before going forward, let's see if the below flow looks good to
> you.
>
> Let me add one more device besides D1 and D2. Say device D3 which also
> uses PASID=1. And assume it begins with no PASID usage in guest.
>
> Then the flow from scratch is:
>
> a) guest IOMMU driver setup PASID entry for D1 with PASID=1,
> then invalidates against PASID #1
> b) trap to QEMU, and comes to this function. Since there is
> no previous pasid cache invalidation, so the Step 1 of this
> function has nothing to do, then goes to Step 2 which is to
> loop all assigned devices and check if the guest pasid entry
> is present. In this loop, should find D1's pasid entry for
> PASID#1 is present. So create the VTDPASIDAddressSpace and
> initialize its pasid_cache_entry and pasid_cache_gen fields.
> c) guest IOMMU driver setup PASID entry for D2 with PASID=2,
> then invalidates against PASID #2
> d) same with b), only difference is the Step 1 of this function
> will loop the VTDPASIDAddressSpace created in b), but its
> pasid is 1 which is not the target of current pasid cache
> invalidation. Same with b), in Step 2, it will create a
> VTDPASIDAddressSpace for D2+PASID#2
> e) guest IOMMU driver setup PASID entry for D3 with PASID=1,
> then invalidates against PASID #1
> f) trap to QEMU and comes to this function. Step 1 loops two
> VTDPASIDAddressSpace created in b) and d), and it finds there
> is a VTDPASIDAddressSpace whose pasid is 1. vtd_flush_pasid()
> will check if the cached pasid entry is the same with the one
> in guest memory. In this flow, it should be the same, so
> vtd_flush_pasid() will do nothing for it. Then comes to Step 2,
> it loops D1, D2, D3.
> - For D1, no need to do more since there is already a
> VTDPASIDAddressSpace created for D1+PASID#1.
> - For D2, its guest pasid entry for PASID#1 is not present, so
> no need to do anything for it.
> - For D3, its guest pasid entry for PASID#1 is present and it
> is exactly the reason for this invalidation. So create a
> VTDPASIDAddressSpace for and init the pasid_cache_entry and
> pasid_cache_gen fields.
>
> > I feel like we shouldn't create VTDPASIDAddressSpace only if it existed,
> > say, until
> > when we reach vtd_dev_get_pe_from_pasid() below with retcode==0.
>
> You are right. I think I failed to destroy the VTDAddressSpace when
> vtd_dev_get_pe_from_pasid() returns error. Thus the code won't create
> a VTDPASIDAddressSpace for D2+PASID#1.
OK, but that free() is really not necessary... Please see below.
>
> > Besides this...
> >
> > > + pc_entry = &vtd_pasid_as->pasid_cache_entry;
> > > + if (s->pasid_cache_gen == pc_entry->pasid_cache_gen) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * pasid_cache_gen equals to s->pasid_cache_gen means
> > > + * vtd_pasid_as is valid after the above s->vtd_pasid_as
> > > + * updates in Step 1. Thus no need for the below steps.
> > > + */
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * ii) vtd_pasid_as is not valid, it's potentailly a new
> > > + * pasid bind. Fetch guest pasid entry.
> > > + */
> > > + if (vtd_dev_get_pe_from_pasid(s, bus_n, devfn, pasid, &pe)) {
>
> Yi: should destroy pasid_as as there is no valid pasid entry. Thus to
> ensure all the pasid_as in hash table are valid.
>
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * iii) pasid entry exists, update pasid cache
> > > + *
> > > + * Here need to check domain ID since guest pasid entry
> > > + * exists. What needs to do are:
> > > + * - update the pc_entry in the vtd_pasid_as
> > > + * - set proper pc_entry.pasid_cache_gen
> > > + * - pass down the latest guest pasid entry config to host
> > > + * (will be added in later patch)
> > > + */
> > > + if (domain_id == vtd_pe_get_domain_id(&pe)) {
> > > + vtd_fill_in_pe_in_cache(s, vtd_pasid_as, &pe);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> >
> > <END>
> >
> > ... I'm a bit confused on the whole range between <START> and <END> on how
> > it
> > differs from the vtd_replay_guest_pasid_bindings() you're going to
> > introduce.
> > Shouldn't the replay code do similar thing? Can we merge them?
>
> Yes, there is similar thing which is to create VTDPASIDAddressSpace
> per the guest pasid entry presence.
>
> But there are differences. For one, the code here is to loop all
> assigned devices for a specific PASID. While the logic in
> vtd_replay_guest_pasid_bindings() is to loop all assigned devices
> and the PASID tables behind them. For two, the code here only cares
> about the case which guest pasid entry from INVALID->VALID.
> The reason is in Step 1 of this function, VALID->INVALID and
> VALID->VALID cases are already covered. While the logic in
> vtd_replay_guest_pasid_bindings() needs to cover all the three cases.
> The last reason I didn't merge them is in vtd_replay_guest_pasid_bindings()
> it needs to divide the pasid entry fetch into two steps and check
> the result (if fetch pasid directory entry failed, it could skip a
> range of PASIDs). While the code in this function, it doesn't care
> about it, it only cares if there is a valid pasid entry for this
> specific pasid.
>
> >
> > My understanding is that we can just make sure to do it right once in the
> > replay
> > code (the three cases: INVALID->VALID, VALID->INVALID,
> > VALID->VALID), then no matter whether it's DSI/PSI/GSI, we call the
> > replay code probably with VTDPASIDCacheInfo* passed in, then the replay
> > code will
> > know what to look after.
>
> Hmmm, let me think more to abstract the code between the
> <START> and <END> to be a helper function to be called by
> vtd_replay_guest_pasid_bindings(). Also, in that case, I
> need to apply the two step concept in the replay function.
... I think your vtd_sm_pasid_table_walk() is already suitable for
this because it allows to specify "start" and "end" pasid. Now you're
always passing in the (0, VTD_MAX_HPASID) tuple, here you can simply
pass in (pasid, pasid+1). But I think you need to touch up
vtd_sm_pasid_table_walk() a bit to make sure it allows the pasid to be
not aliged to VTD_PASID_TBL_ENTRY_NUM.
Another thing is I think vtd_sm_pasid_table_walk_one() didn't really
check vtd_pasid_table_walk_info.did domain information... When that's
fixed, this case is the same as the DSI walk with a specific pasid
range.
And again, please also consider to use VTDPASIDCacheInfo to be used
directly during the page walk, so vtd_pasid_table_walk_info can be
replaced I think, because IIUC VTDPASIDCacheInfo contains all
information the table walk will need.
>
> > > +
> > > + vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * Caller of this function should hold iommu_lock */ static void
> > > +vtd_pasid_cache_reset(IntelIOMMUState *s) {
> > > + VTDPASIDCacheInfo pc_info;
> > > +
> > > + trace_vtd_pasid_cache_reset();
> > > +
> > > + pc_info.flags = VTD_PASID_CACHE_GLOBAL;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Reset pasid cache is a big hammer, so use
> > > + * g_hash_table_foreach_remove which will free
> > > + * the vtd_pasid_as instances, indicates the
> > > + * cached pasid_cache_gen would be set to 0.
> > > + */
> > > + g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->vtd_pasid_as,
> > > + vtd_flush_pasid, &pc_info);
> >
> > Would this make sure the per pasid_as pasid_cache_gen will be reset to
> > zero? I'm
> > not very sure, say, what if the memory is stall during a reset and still
> > have the old
> > data?
> >
> > I'm not sure, but I feel like we should simply drop all pasid_as here,
> > rather than
> > using the same code for a global pasid invalidation.
>
> I see. Maybe I can get another helper function which always returns
> true, and replace vtd_flush_pasid with the new function. This should
> ensure all pasid_as are dropped. How do you think?
g_hash_table_remove_all() might be easier. :)
--
Peter Xu
