On 3/30/20 9:00 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 25.03.20 00:20, John Snow wrote:
>> This series uses python logging to enable output conditionally on
>> iotests.log(). We unify an initialization call (which also enables
>> debugging output for those tests with -d) and then make the switch
>> inside of iotests.
>>
>> It will help alleviate the need to create logged/unlogged versions
>> of all the various helpers we have made.
>>
>> Also, I got lost and accidentally delinted iotests while I was here.
>> Sorry about that. By version 9, it's now the overwhelming focus of
>> this series. No good deed, etc.
>
> Generally, test patches are fair game for the freeze period. However,
> this series is quite extensive, so I might prefer block-next here.
> OTOH, if I do take it to block-next, patch 11 might grow stale.
>
> Do you have a strong opinion either way?
>
> Max
>
Not really, no.
Might be nice to see it tossed into the RC while everyone is doing
testing to see if it causes problems. On the other hand, it probably
WILL cause problems with various untested version combinations and so forth.
Either or.
--js
