Hi Eric and all,

When invoking "virsh backup-begin" to do a full backup using qcow2
driver to a new backup

target file that does not have a backing chain, is it safe to not zero
the unallocated

parts of the virtual disk?  Do we still depend on SEEK_DATA support in
this case to avoid

forcing zeros?


It looks like backup_run() in block/backup.c unsets the unallocated
parts of a copy bitmap

before starting the backup loop if s->sync_mode ==
MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_TOP. In a virsh backup-begin

full backup scenario, we observe that the mode is
MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_FULL, and the backup_loop()

function subsequently copies zeros for the entire virtual size,
including the unallocated parts

in the source qcow2 file.  Would it be safe to also unset the
unallocated parts in the copy

map when the sync_mode is MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_FULL if we know there is no
need to force zeros

because the target file is a new empty qcow2 file without a backing
file?  If so, maybe a

knob can be added to effect this behavior?


I guess the related code is changing in 5.0 and this issue may already
be adddressed.

Any updates/insights would be appreciated!


Thanks,

Leo


*From*: Eric Blake
*Subject*: Re: Domain backup file explodes on s3fs
*Date*: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:37:26 -0500
*User-agent*: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.6.0
------------------------------

[adding libvirt list]

On 4/7/20 2:13 PM, Tim Haley wrote:

Hi all,


Have been playing with `virsh backup-begin` of late and think it's an excellent
feature. I've noticed one behavior I'm not sure I understand.

It looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814664 is a similar
description of the same problem: namely, if qemu is not able to determine
that the destination already reads as zero, then it forcefully zeroes the
destination of a backup job. We may want to copy the fact that qemu 5.0 is
adding 'qemu-img convert --target-is-zero' to add a similar knob to the QMP
commands that trigger disk copying (blockdev-backup, blockdev-mirror,
possibly others) as well as logic to avoid writing zeroes when the
destination is already treated as zero (whether by a probe, or by the knob
being set).

...


If my /backups directory is just XFS, I get a backup file that looks like
it is just the size of data blocks in use

-rw------- 1 root  root  2769551360 Mar 19 16:56
vda.2aa450cc-6d2e-11ea-8de0-52542e0d008a

For a local file, qemu is easily able to probe whether the destination starts
as all zeroes (thanks to lseek(SEEK_DATA));

but if I write to an s3fs (object storage backend) the file blows up to the
whole size of the disk

-rw------- 1 root  root  8591507456 Mar 18 19:03
vda.2aa450cc-6d2e-11ea-8de0-52542e0d008a

whereas for s3fs, it looks like qemu does not have access to a quick test
to learn if the image starts all zero (POSIX does not provide a quick way
for doing this on a generic block device, but if you are aware of an ioctl
or otherwise that qemu could use, that might be helpful). Or maybe the s3fs
really is random contents rather than all zero, in which case forcefully
writing zeroes is the only correct behavior.

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Reply via email to