On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 18:18:39 +0900,
Pan Nengyuan wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/20/2020 4:50 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:49:59 +0900,
> > Pan Nengyuan wrote:
> >>
> >> We got the following compile-time warnings(gcc7.3):
> >> /mnt/sdb//qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c: In function ‘helper_scmpu’:
> >> /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c:213:24: error: ‘tmp1’ may be used 
> >> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> >>      env->psw_c = (tmp0 >= tmp1);
> >>                   ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
> >> /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c:213:24: error: ‘tmp0’ may be used 
> >> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> >> /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c: In function ‘helper_suntil’:
> >> /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c:299:23: error: ‘tmp’ may be used 
> >> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> >>      env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
> >>                   ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c: In function ‘helper_swhile’:
> >> /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c:318:23: error: ‘tmp’ may be used 
> >> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> >>      env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
> >>
> >> Actually, it looks like a false-positive because it will enter the body of 
> >> while loop and init it for the first time.
> >> Let's change 'while' to 'do .. while' to avoid it.
> > 
> > OK.
> > 
> >> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.ro...@huawei.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengy...@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >>  target/rx/op_helper.c | 12 ++++++------
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/target/rx/op_helper.c b/target/rx/op_helper.c
> >> index f89d294f2b..b612ab1da8 100644
> >> --- a/target/rx/op_helper.c
> >> +++ b/target/rx/op_helper.c
> >> @@ -201,14 +201,14 @@ void helper_scmpu(CPURXState *env)
> >>      if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
> >>          return;
> >>      }
> >> -    while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
> >> +    do {
> >>          tmp0 = cpu_ldub_data_ra(env, env->regs[1]++, GETPC());
> >>          tmp1 = cpu_ldub_data_ra(env, env->regs[2]++, GETPC());
> >>          env->regs[3]--;
> >>          if (tmp0 != tmp1 || tmp0 == '\0') {
> >>              break;
> >>          }
> >> -    }
> >> +    } while (env->regs[3] != 0);
> >>      env->psw_z = tmp0 - tmp1;
> >>      env->psw_c = (tmp0 >= tmp1);
> >>  }
> >> @@ -287,14 +287,14 @@ void helper_suntil(CPURXState *env, uint32_t sz)
> >>      if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
> >>          return ;
> >>      }
> >> -    while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
> >> +    do {
> >>          tmp = cpu_ldufn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
> >>          env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
> >>          env->regs[3]--;
> >>          if (tmp == env->regs[2]) {
> >>              break;
> >>          }
> >> -    }
> >> +    } while (env->regs[3] != 0);
> >>      env->psw_z = tmp - env->regs[2];
> >>      env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
> >>  }
> >> @@ -306,14 +306,14 @@ void helper_swhile(CPURXState *env, uint32_t sz)
> >>      if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
> >>          return ;
> >>      }
> >> -    while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
> >> +    do {
> >>          tmp = cpu_ldufn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
> >>          env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
> >>          env->regs[3]--;
> >>          if (tmp != env->regs[2]) {
> >>              break;
> >>          }
> >> -    }
> >> +    } while (env->regs[3] != 0);
> >>      env->psw_z = env->regs[3];
> >>      env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
> >>  }
> >> -- 
> >> 2.18.2
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > It looks different result in env->regs[3] is zero.
> 
> If env->regs[3] is zero, it will return at the begin of these functions:
> 
>   if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
>       return;
>   }
> 
> Thus, the while loop will not be reached.
> In this case, I think 'while' and 'do .. while' will get the same result and 
> it will disappear the warnings.

Oh. Sorry. I misunderstood.

Since the pseudo code described in the manual uses while,
I think it's easier for everyone to understand by following
the description.

> > In such a case, nothing changes.
> > 
> > I think that the warning of the uninitialized variable
> > will disappear by fixing as follows.
> > 
> 
> Yes, it also can fix these warnings.

OK. Thanks.

> Thanks.
> 
> >>From 5de0c54a970e01e96b41870252d0ea54ec61c540 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Yoshinori Sato <ys...@users.sourceforge.jp>
> > Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:41:04 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH] target/rx/op_helper: Fix uninitialized warning.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ys...@users.sourceforge.jp>
> > ---
> >  target/rx/op_helper.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/target/rx/op_helper.c b/target/rx/op_helper.c
> > index f89d294f2b..f84f6c706c 100644
> > --- a/target/rx/op_helper.c
> > +++ b/target/rx/op_helper.c
> > @@ -284,38 +284,36 @@ void helper_suntil(CPURXState *env, uint32_t sz)
> >  {
> >      uint32_t tmp;
> >      tcg_debug_assert(sz < 3);
> > -    if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
> > -        return ;
> > -    }
> > -    while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
> > -        tmp = cpu_ldufn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
> > -        env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
> > -        env->regs[3]--;
> > -        if (tmp == env->regs[2]) {
> > -            break;
> > +    if (env->regs[3] > 0) {
> > +        while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
> > +            tmp = cpu_ldufn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
> > +            env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
> > +            env->regs[3]--;
> > +            if (tmp == env->regs[2]) {
> > +                break;
> > +            }
> >          }
> > +        env->psw_z = tmp - env->regs[2];
> > +        env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
> >      }
> > -    env->psw_z = tmp - env->regs[2];
> > -    env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void helper_swhile(CPURXState *env, uint32_t sz)
> >  {
> >      uint32_t tmp;
> >      tcg_debug_assert(sz < 3);
> > -    if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
> > -        return ;
> > -    }
> > -    while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
> > -        tmp = cpu_ldufn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
> > -        env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
> > -        env->regs[3]--;
> > -        if (tmp != env->regs[2]) {
> > -            break;
> > +    if (env->regs[3] > 0) {
> > +        while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
> > +            tmp = cpu_ldufn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
> > +            env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
> > +            env->regs[3]--;
> > +            if (tmp != env->regs[2]) {
> > +                break;
> > +            }
> >          }
> > +        env->psw_z = env->regs[3];
> > +        env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
> >      }
> > -    env->psw_z = env->regs[3];
> > -    env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* accumlator operations */
> > @@ -325,40 +323,39 @@ void helper_rmpa(CPURXState *env, uint32_t sz)
> >      int32_t result_h;
> >      int64_t tmp0, tmp1;
> >  
> > -    if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
> > -        return;
> > -    }
> > -    result_l = env->regs[5];
> > -    result_l <<= 32;
> > -    result_l |= env->regs[4];
> > -    result_h = env->regs[6];
> > -    env->psw_o = 0;
> > +    if (env->regs[3] > 0) {
> > +        result_l = env->regs[5];
> > +        result_l <<= 32;
> > +        result_l |= env->regs[4];
> > +        result_h = env->regs[6];
> > +        env->psw_o = 0;
> >  
> > -    while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
> > -        tmp0 = cpu_ldfn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
> > -        tmp1 = cpu_ldfn[sz](env, env->regs[2], GETPC());
> > -        tmp0 *= tmp1;
> > -        prev = result_l;
> > -        result_l += tmp0;
> > -        /* carry / bollow */
> > -        if (tmp0 < 0) {
> > -            if (prev > result_l) {
> > -                result_h--;
> > -            }
> > -        } else {
> > -            if (prev < result_l) {
> > -                result_h++;
> > +        while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
> > +            tmp0 = cpu_ldfn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
> > +            tmp1 = cpu_ldfn[sz](env, env->regs[2], GETPC());
> > +            tmp0 *= tmp1;
> > +            prev = result_l;
> > +            result_l += tmp0;
> > +            /* carry / bollow */
> > +            if (tmp0 < 0) {
> > +                if (prev > result_l) {
> > +                    result_h--;
> > +                }
> > +            } else {
> > +                if (prev < result_l) {
> > +                    result_h++;
> > +                }
> >              }
> > -        }
> >  
> > -        env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
> > -        env->regs[2] += 1 << sz;
> > +            env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
> > +            env->regs[2] += 1 << sz;
> > +        }
> > +        env->psw_s = result_h;
> > +        env->psw_o = (result_h != 0 && result_h != -1) << 31;
> > +        env->regs[6] = result_h;
> > +        env->regs[5] = result_l >> 32;
> > +        env->regs[4] = result_l & 0xffffffff;
> >      }
> > -    env->psw_s = result_h;
> > -    env->psw_o = (result_h != 0 && result_h != -1) << 31;
> > -    env->regs[6] = result_h;
> > -    env->regs[5] = result_l >> 32;
> > -    env->regs[4] = result_l & 0xffffffff;
> >  }
> >  
> >  void helper_racw(CPURXState *env, uint32_t imm)
> > 

-- 
Yosinori Sato

Reply via email to