On 4/30/20 1:51 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
We will move this code in the next commit. Clean it up
first to avoid checkpatch.pl errors.
Oops this isn't the next commit anymore :S
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200423073358.27155-5-phi...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/cpu.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index 30e961f7754..a1e38b38ba1 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -582,7 +582,8 @@ static bool arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int
interrupt_request)
CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
bool ret = false;
- /* ARMv7-M interrupt masking works differently than -A or -R.
+ /*
+ * ARMv7-M interrupt masking works differently than -A or -R.
* There is no FIQ/IRQ distinction. Instead of I and F bits
* masking FIQ and IRQ interrupts, an exception is taken only
* if it is higher priority than the current execution priority
@@ -1912,7 +1913,8 @@ static void arm1026_initfn(Object *obj)
static void arm1136_r2_initfn(Object *obj)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
- /* What qemu calls "arm1136_r2" is actually the 1136 r0p2, ie an
+ /*
+ * What qemu calls "arm1136_r2" is actually the 1136 r0p2, ie an
* older core than plain "arm1136". In particular this does not
* have the v6K features.
* These ID register values are correct for 1136 but may be wrong
@@ -2698,7 +2700,8 @@ static const ARMCPUInfo arm_cpus[] = {
{ .name = "arm926", .initfn = arm926_initfn },
{ .name = "arm946", .initfn = arm946_initfn },
{ .name = "arm1026", .initfn = arm1026_initfn },
- /* What QEMU calls "arm1136-r2" is actually the 1136 r0p2, i.e. an
+ /*
+ * What QEMU calls "arm1136-r2" is actually the 1136 r0p2, i.e. an
* older core than plain "arm1136". In particular this does not
* have the v6K features.
*/
