On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2020 19:18:21 CEST Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Commit SHA-1 16724a173049ac29c7b5ade741da93a0f46edff7 introduced > truncating the response to the currently available transport buffer > size, which was supposed to fix an 9pfs error on Xen boot where > transport buffer might still be smaller than required for response. > > Unfortunately this change broke small reads (with less than 12 > bytes). > > To address both concerns, check the actual response type and only > truncate reply for Rreaddir responses, and only if truncated reply > would at least return one payload byte to client. Use Rreaddir's > precise header size (11) for this instead of P9_IOHDRSZ.
Oops, that should have been "Rread's" of course, not "Rreaddir's". Apparently I already spent too much time on readdir() code. If there's not more to do, then maybe you could just amend this log message typo Greg? I would appreciate it. Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck
