Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> writes: > On 5/18/20 7:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> This is the instrumentation mentioned in "[PATCH 00/24] Fixes around >> device realization". >> >> PATCH 2/5 might have value on its own. You tell me. > > I'd like to have 2/3 merged normally because as you described, having > reproducible output makes testing simpler. Can you repost them with > proper syntax/style?
I will. > I have similar hacks than 1/4/5. > What about having the warnings always displayed with warn_report() > while running QTests? Simply checking qtest_enabled(). PATCH 1 and 4 get superseded by "[PATCH 24/24] qdev: Assert onboard devices all get realized properly". PATCH 5 gets superseded by "[PATCH 22/24] qdev: Assert devices are plugged into a bus that can take them".
