On 14/05/2020 14.37, Janosch Frank wrote: > ZMODE has a lot of ambiguity with the ESAME architecture mode, but is > actually 64 bit addressing. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <fran...@linux.ibm.com> > Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> > --- > pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c | 3 +-- > pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c > index 0fc879bb8e..b932531e6f 100644 > --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c > +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c > @@ -229,7 +229,6 @@ void dasd_ipl(SubChannelId schid, uint16_t cutype) > run_ipl2(schid, cutype, ipl2_addr); > > /* Transfer control to the guest operating system */ > - pswl->mask |= PSW_MASK_EAMODE; /* Force z-mode */ > - pswl->addr |= PSW_MASK_BAMODE; /* ... */ > + pswl->mask |= PSW_MASK_64; /* Force 64 bit addressing */
This is not only a rename (as announced in the subject), but also a change in behavior since you now do not change pswl->addr anymore. So this is even a bug fix? Could you please mention this in the patch description, too? Thanks, Thomas
