On 31.05.20 19:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> In an effort to remove the cpu_physical_memory_rw() API,
> update s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw() to use a more recent
> address_space_rw() API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
> ---
> target/s390x/mmu_helper.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
> index 7d9f3059cd..632e8a8af4 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
> @@ -529,8 +529,10 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr,
> uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
> /* Copy data by stepping through the area page by page */
> for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> currlen = MIN(len, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE - (laddr %
> TARGET_PAGE_SIZE));
> - cpu_physical_memory_rw(pages[i] | (laddr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK),
> - hostbuf, currlen, is_write);
> + address_space_rw(CPU(cpu)->as,
> + pages[i] | (laddr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK),
> + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
> + hostbuf, currlen, is_write);
> laddr += currlen;
> hostbuf += currlen;
> len -= currlen;
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
