On 19/06/20 14:02, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> Paolo, does this break migration of encrypted memory assumptions?
>>
>> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
>> Supersedes: <20200617130800.26355-1-phi...@redhat.com>
> I'm not seeing the relevance to migration.

I told Philippe that there could be a possibility in the future of
having more than one KVMState to support SEV live migration, so removing
all KVMState* arguments is not a good idea.  But for kvm_check_extension
calls it should be safe, as those should be the same for all VMs.

Paolo


Reply via email to