On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 21:14, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > > Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Most of them are due to unsupported/differently implemented > > syscalls. > > Yeah, I think that was the basis of my confusion -- qemu-arm is not a > bare metal environment, and my work is focused on enabling application > development in that environment.
Yes, but for certain cases of bare-metal code that doesn't need to touch devices or use any privileged-only instructions it may be a usable environment. (This is more side-effect than intentional: as you say the primary use case is Linux userspace binaries.) thanks -- PMM
