уторак, 30. јун 2020., Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> је написао/ла:
> Hi, > > Following Jiaxun Yang's patch and discussion: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11416915/ > > - Rename the current machine as 'malta-virt' (keeping 'malta' aliased) > Suggestions for better names are welcome, maybe 'malta-unreal' or > 'malta-unleashed' instead? > - Add 'malta-phys' which respects hardware restrictions (on RAM so far) > - Unleash 'malta-virt' to allow more than 2GB on 64-bit > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (7): > hw/mips/malta: Trivial code movement > hw/mips/malta: Register the machine as a TypeInfo > hw/mips/malta: Rename 'malta' machine as 'malta-virt' > hw/mips/malta: Introduce MaltaMachineClass::max_ramsize > hw/mips/malta: Introduce the 'malta-phys' machine > hw/mips/malta: Verify malta-phys machine uses correct DIMM sizes > hw/mips/malta: Allow more than 2GB on 64-bit malta-virt > > hw/mips/malta.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > -- Thank you, Philippe, for providing this series. However, in previous discussion on the patch you mention above, I already expressed serious reservations on the approach taken in that patch. These reservations stay today too. There is nothing qualitatively different between the original patch and this series. Naming and related stuff are just cosmetic issues. The good thing about this series is that one can apply it dowstream, if one finds it useful. However, it is not suitable for upstreaming Regards, Aleksandar > 2.21.3 > >
