On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:20:52PM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com>
>
> Some devices might want to know the return value of dma_memory_rw, so
> pass it along instead of ignoring it.
>
> There are no existing users of the return value, so this patch should be
> safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Keith Busch <kbu...@kernel.org>
Feel free to merge with patch 2/2.
> ---
> include/hw/pci/pci.h | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> index a4e9c3341615..2347dc36bfb5 100644
> --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> @@ -786,8 +786,7 @@ static inline AddressSpace
> *pci_get_address_space(PCIDevice *dev)
> static inline int pci_dma_rw(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
> void *buf, dma_addr_t len, DMADirection dir)
> {
> - dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir);
> - return 0;
> + return dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir);
> }
>
> static inline int pci_dma_read(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
> --
> 2.27.0
