On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 6:32 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/27/20 1:55 AM, Havard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * This covers the whole MMIO space. We'll use this to catch any MMIO
> > accesses
> > + * that aren't handled by any device.
> > + */
> > +#define NPCM7XX_MMIO_BA (0x80000000)
> > +#define NPCM7XX_MMIO_SZ (0x7FFD0000)
>
> Could be 0x80000000 since UNIMP_DEVICE is created with low
> priority.
Good point, I'll do that.
> > + /* I/O space -- unimplemented unless overridden below. */
> > + create_unimplemented_device("npcm7xx.io", NPCM7XX_MMIO_BA,
> > NPCM7XX_MMIO_SZ);
>
> Note by doing that you won't get transaction failures when accessing
> unassigned regions. This not incorrect, but a bit overkill (this covers
> almost 2GiB...).
A lot of that 2GiB space is used by six 128 MiB flash memory
apertures. But there are some holes that probably should generate
transaction failures instead of a default response.
Would it be OK if I send a patch to tighten up the unimplemented space
once a few more of the peripherals have been implemented?
Havard
