On 13/07/2020 18.39, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes: > >> On 7/9/20 7:13 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> Not all compilers support the -Wpsabi (clang-9 in my case). >>> >>> Fixes: bac8d222a >>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> tests/plugin/Makefile | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/tests/plugin/Makefile b/tests/plugin/Makefile >>> index 0cb8e35ae407..dcfbd99b15b8 100644 >>> --- a/tests/plugin/Makefile >>> +++ b/tests/plugin/Makefile >>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ NAMES += hwprofile >>> >>> SONAMES := $(addsuffix .so,$(addprefix lib,$(NAMES))) >>> >>> -QEMU_CFLAGS += -fPIC -Wpsabi >>> +QEMU_CFLAGS += -fPIC -Wno-unknown-warning-option -Wpsabi >> >> Surely -Wno-unknown-warning-option is in the same boat? E.g. I don't see any >> version of gcc that supports it. > > GCC doesn't seem to complain about it though.
Both, GCC and Clang do not complain about unknown -Wno-somthing options as long as there are no other warnings. They only complain for options that do not have a "no-" after the "-W". Thomas
