Thanks Mr. Aleksandar for your feedback! On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 1:09 PM Aleksandar Markovic < aleksandar.qemu.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Ahmed. > > The report, and the topic in general, look quite interesting. However, I > would suggest two improvements: > > - The title should reflect the content in a clearer way. Let's say, > "Compilers and QEMU performance" would be IMHO better. The expression "two > builds" is just missing the central motivation of the report, which is > comparing gcc-built QEMU and clang-built QEMU, performance-wise. > > - At the end, a section "Useful links" would be handy, akin to the similar > section in Report 1. There were many people that analysed (and posted their > results on the internet) gcc vs clang in terms of performance of produced > executables (in contexts other than QEMU). Having the most useful and > informative ones (3-5 links with a short summary for each one would be more > than sufficient) listed in this report would enhance it significantly. > > Yours, > Aleksandar > > > On Monday, July 27, 2020, Ahmed Karaman <ahmedkhaledkara...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> The sixth report of the TCG Continuous Benchmarking project presents a >> performance comparison between two different QEMU builds, GCC and Clang. >> >> The report also presents five new benchmarks to allow for a variety of >> test workloads. Each of the five benchmarks is executed for seventeen >> different QEMU targets on both the GCC and Clang builds. >> >> The resulting ten tables are then summarized then analyzed using the >> list_helpers.py and list_fn_callees.py scripts. The entire workflow is >> automated using Python scripts that are posted in the report. >> >> Report link: >> >> https://ahmedkrmn.github.io/TCG-Continuous-Benchmarking/Performance-Comparison-of-Two-QEMU-Builds/ >> >> Previous reports: >> Report 1 - Measuring Basic Performance Metrics of QEMU: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-06/msg06692.html >> Report 2 - Dissecting QEMU Into Three Main Parts: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-06/msg09441.html >> Report 3 - QEMU 5.0 and 5.1-pre-soft-freeze Dissect Comparison: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg01978.html >> Report 4 - Listing QEMU Helpers and Function Callees: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg04227.html >> Report 5 - Finding Commits Affecting QEMU Performance: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg05769.html >> >> Best regards, >> Ahmed Karaman >> >
