andrzej zaborowski <balr...@gmail.com> writes: > On 3 August 2011 20:24, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> andrzej zaborowski <balr...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On 3 August 2011 18:38, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> andrzej zaborowski <balr...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> 2. if the >>>>> underlaying storage can disappear for any other reason if that's >>>>> possible to check. >>>> >>>> bdrv_is_removable() *isn't* such a check. >>> >>> Obviously I wasn't claiming it is, just that it might be useful, but >>> not necessrily possible. After all pretty much any storage can be >>> "ejected" with enough force, depending on how far you want to go. >>> >>>>>> What's wrong with that again? All sounds sensible to me. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not claiming otherwise, just double-checking this is what you want. >>> >>> So first you said you had a problem with _is_removable, and then you >>> said nothing was wrong with the implementation you outlined, plase >>> make up your mind. >> >> I don't appreciate you quoting me out of context like that. > > I got quite annoyed when you started putting words in my mouth by > saying I said anything about CD-ROM.. the code in spitz/tosa is not
I didn't intend to annoy. It was an honest attempt to figure out what you want to accomplish there. Sorry it came out the wrong way. [...]
