On 31/08/2020 18.40, Alexander Bulekov wrote: > On 200831 1732, Thomas Huth wrote: >> The fuzzer job finishes quite early, so we can run the unit tests and >> qtests with -fsanitize=address here without extending the total test time. >> > > Sounds good to me, though its too bad that this is limited to i386 and > we aren't using the --enable-sanitizers configure argument due to the > strange oss-fuzz build script. > > Speaking of testing with sanitizers, does it make sense to have a job > that does check-qtest with --enable-tsan, now that we have > ThreadSanitizer support? > > Can --enable-sanitizers --enable-tsan be added to some existing job, > without severely increasing the pipeline's exeuction time?
Good idea, I'll have a try when I've got some spare time again (probably not this week, though, it's a pretty busy one for me). > Reviewed-by: Alexander Bulekov <alx...@bu.edu> Thanks! Thomas
