On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:22:15 +0200 Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:08:19 +0200 > > Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> Device models should be able to use it without an unclean include of > >> block_int.h. > > > > Nitpick: I'd do the prototype move after patch 38/45 and include the > > block_int.h removal in the patch you're trimming block_int.h includes. > > Care to explain why? Seems more logical to me to solve the dependencies one by one and then drop the includes in one shot. Maybe could even be done in a different series.
