On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:56:43AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > In a similar fashion as the previous patch, let's move the > handling of ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays from spapr.c to > spapr_numa.c. A spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays() helper was > created, and spapr_dt_dynamic_reconfiguration_memory() can now > use it to advertise the lookup-arrays. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb...@gmail.com> > --- > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 25 ++---------------------- > hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c > index 172f965fe0..65d2ccd578 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c > @@ -535,13 +535,10 @@ static int > spapr_dt_dynamic_reconfiguration_memory(SpaprMachineState *spapr, > void *fdt) > { > MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr); > - int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes; > - int ret, i, offset; > + int ret, offset; > uint64_t lmb_size = SPAPR_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; > uint32_t prop_lmb_size[] = {cpu_to_be32(lmb_size >> 32), > cpu_to_be32(lmb_size & 0xffffffff)}; > - uint32_t *int_buf, *cur_index, buf_len; > - int nr_nodes = nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 1; > MemoryDeviceInfoList *dimms = NULL; > > /* > @@ -582,25 +579,7 @@ static int > spapr_dt_dynamic_reconfiguration_memory(SpaprMachineState *spapr, > return ret; > } > > - /* ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays */ > - buf_len = (nr_nodes * 4 + 2) * sizeof(uint32_t); > - cur_index = int_buf = g_malloc0(buf_len); > - int_buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(nr_nodes); > - int_buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(4); /* Number of entries per associativity list > */ > - cur_index += 2; > - for (i = 0; i < nr_nodes; i++) { > - uint32_t associativity[] = { > - cpu_to_be32(0x0), > - cpu_to_be32(0x0), > - cpu_to_be32(0x0), > - cpu_to_be32(i) > - }; > - memcpy(cur_index, associativity, sizeof(associativity)); > - cur_index += 4; > - } > - ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays", > int_buf, > - (cur_index - int_buf) * sizeof(uint32_t)); > - g_free(int_buf); > + ret = spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(spapr, fdt, offset); > > return ret; > } > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c > index b8882d209e..9eb4bdbe80 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c > @@ -75,6 +75,45 @@ int spapr_numa_fixup_cpu_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void > *fdt, > vcpu_assoc, sizeof(vcpu_assoc)); > } > > + > +int spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt, > + int offset) > +{ > + MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr); > + SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr); > + int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes; > + int nr_nodes = nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 1; > + uint32_t *int_buf, *cur_index, buf_len; > + int ret, i, j; > + > + /* ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays */ > + buf_len = (nr_nodes * MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS + 2) * sizeof(uint32_t); > + cur_index = int_buf = g_malloc0(buf_len); > + int_buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(nr_nodes); > + /* Number of entries per associativity list */ > + int_buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS); > + cur_index += 2; > + for (i = 0; i < nr_nodes; i++) { > + /* > + * For the lookup-array we use the ibm,associativity array, > + * from numa_assoc_array. without the first element (size). > + */ > + uint32_t associativity[MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS]; > + > + for (j = 0; j < MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS; j++) { > + associativity[j] = smc->numa_assoc_array[i][j + 1]; > + } > + > + memcpy(cur_index, associativity, sizeof(associativity));
AFAICT, you could just use a single memcpy() to copy from the numa_assoc_array() into the property here, rather than using a loop and temporary array. > + cur_index += 4; Shouldn't this be += MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS? > + } > + ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays", > int_buf, > + (cur_index - int_buf) * sizeof(uint32_t)); > + g_free(int_buf); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > /* > * Helper that writes ibm,associativity-reference-points and > * max-associativity-domains in the RTAS pointed by @rtas > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h > index f92fb4f28a..f6127501a6 100644 > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ void spapr_numa_write_associativity_dt(SpaprMachineState > *spapr, void *fdt, > int offset, int nodeid); > int spapr_numa_fixup_cpu_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt, > int offset, PowerPCCPU *cpu); > +int spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt, > + int offset); > > > #endif /* HW_SPAPR_NUMA_H */ -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature