On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:41 PM Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 19:51, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/13/20 6:01 PM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:35 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> > > <phi...@redhat.com <mailto:phi...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >     On 9/13/20 12:44 AM, Yonggang Luo wrote:
> > >     > On windows, a difference in line endings causes testsuite
> failures
> > >     > complaining that every single line in files such as
> > >     > 'tests/qapi-schemadoc-good.texi' is wrong.  Fix it by adding -b
> to
> > >     diff.
> > >
> > >     Isn't '--strip-trailing-cr' more adapted?
> > >
> > > er, I did that before.....
> >
> > So, yes/no? We can not follow all patches, so better if you
> > add a note about your changes, either in the patch description
> > if you think it's worthwhile keeping that information in the
> > git history, else below the '---' separator, so that information
> > is stripped from the patch when applying.
> >
> > Looking at the archive I see Thomas said this option is not
> > POSIX thus not portable.
> >
> > What about adding this?
> >
> > "Ideally we would use the '--strip-trailing-cr' option, but not
> > being POSIX is a portability problem (i.e. BSDs and Solaris
> > based OSes). Instead use the '-b' option which, although doing
> > slightly more, produce the expected result on Windows."
>
> The other important point to note here is that because
> texi output is mostly not case-sensitive, we are not
> losing important test coverage by not checking for exact
> whitespace matches between the known-good output and
> the generated output. If we were checking the doc-good.out
> text file, -b would be bad because there whitespace is
> important and is part of what we need to be checking.
>
> (Also the texi stuff is going to go away soon I hope :-))
>
So continue with -b are accepted? or I just diable it on win32?

>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>


-- 
         此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
    sincerely,
Yonggang Luo

Reply via email to