On 08/09/2011 10:37 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 9 August 2011 07:34, Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Also, my patchset focuses on mechanical transformations. It is already
> risky enough in terms of regressions, I'm not going to rewrite/improve all
> of qemu; if you want those callbacks removed, you will have to remove them
> yourself.
Sure. Can I ask you to drop this one and the onenand patch, and I'll
have a go over the next week or three at incorporating a conversion into
the patchset I have for those?
Umm... next week or three? I'd like to move fast on this.
Can't you base your patches on this instead? After all, this is just a
mechanical transformation, there should be no functional change.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
