Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 8 August 2011 13:56, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: >> QEMU deals with a lot of fixed width integer types; their names >> (uint64_t etc) are clumsy to use and take up a lot of space. >> >> Following Linux, introduce shorter names, for example U64 for >> uint64_t. > > Strongly disagree. uint64_t &c are standard types and it's > immediately clear to a competent C programmer what they are. > Random qemu-specific funny named types just introduces an > unnecessary level of indirection. > > We only just recently managed to get rid of the nonstandard > typenames for these from fpu/...
Agreed. And if we want to change them to be "linux-like", can we just use the linux names? Using a name with uppercase just looks doubly wrong on my eyes. Later, Juan.
