On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:32:05 +0200 Claudio Imbrenda <imbre...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:18:55 +0200 > Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:13:49 -0400 > > Collin Walling <wall...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Collin Walling wrote: > > > > On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, applied. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks Conny. > > > > > > > > Much appreciated for everyone's patience and review. The only > > > > thing I'd like to hold out on for now is for someone to take a > > > > peek at patch #3 with respect to the protected virtualization > > > > stuff. I don't know too much about it, honestly, and I want to > > > > ensure that dynamically allocating memory for the SCCB makes > > > > sense there. The alternative would be to allocate a static 4K for > > > > the work_sccb. > > > > > > I had someone take a look at the patch for PV and was told > > > everything looks sane. Since the patches have already been applied, > > > it seems like it's too late to add a reviewed-by from someone? > > > > Have the reviewer reply with their R-b, and I'll happily add it, as I > > rebase s390-next before doing a pull req anyway :) > > well it was me :) > > you can add a > > Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbre...@linux.ibm.com> > > for the first 6 patches, and an > > Acked-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbre...@linux.ibm.com> > > for the last one > > > thanks! > Thanks, updated and pushed out.