On 08/11/2011 09:38 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 08/11/2011 03:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Or to have automatic generation of the optionals based on the
>>>> primitives, if the optionals are not present.
>>>
>>> That's what's happening in the background already, no? The line is towards
>>> tcg users though, not it tcg internal code.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, and it doesn't make sense to optimize through synthetic instructions.
> 
> I'd just create all INDEX_op_* enums and adjust TCG targets etc. to
> call tcg_abort() in the default case.
> 

Seconded.  We can still expand the optional enums exactly as we do now,
but make sure that the enum is always present.  That'll clean up a *lot*
of ifdefs throughout tcg/*.


r~

Reply via email to