On Wed,  7 Oct 2020 14:28:44 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This forth version is based on review comments and suggestion

Series for SLOF ? ;-) ;-) ;-)

> from David in v3.
> 
> changes from v3:
> - patch 4:
>     * copied the explanation in spapr_numa_define_associativity_domains()
>       to the commit message
>     * return numa_level directly instead of calculating a temp
>       value in spapr_numa_get_numa_level()
>     * we're now setting assoc_src in all n_levels above it in 
>       spapr_numa_define_associativity_domains()
> - patch 5:
>     * changed the documentation as suggested by David
> 
> v3 link: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg10443.html
> 
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (5):
>   spapr: add spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa() helper
>   spapr_numa: forbid asymmetrical NUMA setups
>   spapr_numa: change reference-points and maxdomain settings
>   spapr_numa: consider user input when defining associativity
>   specs/ppc-spapr-numa: update with new NUMA support
> 
>  capstone                      |   2 +-
>  docs/specs/ppc-spapr-numa.rst | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c                |  12 ++
>  hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c           | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h        |   2 +
>  5 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 


Reply via email to