On 10/9/20 11:48 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:04:15 -0400
Matthew Rosato <mjros...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
We use the capability chains of the VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO ioctl to retrieve
the CLP information that the kernel exports.
To be compatible with previous kernel versions we fall back on previous
predefined values, same as the emulation values, when the ioctl is found
to not support capability chains. If individual CLP capabilities are not
found, we fall back on default values for only those capabilities missing
from the chain.
This patch is based on work previously done by Pierre Morel.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjros...@linux.ibm.com>
---
hw/s390x/meson.build | 1 +
hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 10 +-
hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 1 +
include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-clp.h | 12 ++-
include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.h | 19 ++++
6 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c
create mode 100644 include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.h
(...)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..43684c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+/*
+ * s390 vfio-pci interfaces
+ *
+ * Copyright 2020 IBM Corp.
+ * Author(s): Matthew Rosato <mjros...@linux.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
+ * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
+ * directory.
+ */
+
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <linux/vfio.h>
+#include <linux/vfio_zdev.h>
+
+#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-clp.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.h"
+#include "hw/vfio/pci.h"
+
+#ifndef DEBUG_S390PCI_VFIO
+#define DEBUG_S390PCI_VFIO 0
+#endif
+
+#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
+ do { \
+ if (DEBUG_S390PCI_VFIO) { \
+ fprintf(stderr, "S390pci-vfio: " fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); \
+ } \
+ } while (0)
Not really a fan of DPRINTF. Can you maybe use trace events instead?
Sure, I was just continuing what -inst.c and -bus.c do today. I'll
remove DPRINTF here and look at what trace-events make sense, with a
note to convert the rest of s390-pci* to use trace events at some later
time.
Other than that, looks good to me.
Thanks! Assuming nobody has further comments, I'll plan to send both
this set (with the change above) and the 's390x/pci: Accomodate vfio DMA
limiting' set merged together with a single linux header sync once
5.10-rc1 is available, sound OK?
