Hi Laurent, El 18/08/2011, a las 15:02, Laurent Vivier escribió:
> > > Le 18 août 2011 à 13:12, "François Revol" <re...@free.fr> a écrit : > > > Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : > > > Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit : > > >> On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: > > >>> These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within qemu, and > > >>> are what I used as a basis for my > > >>> Google Summer of Code project to add NeXT hardware support to QEMU. > > >> > > >> Please don't crap flood the list with a series of 100 patches. > > >> > > >> Split things into logical chunks such that a series can be reasonably > > >> reviewed and applied. > > > > > > And I'm not sure this series of patches is ready for inclusion in qemu > > > mainline as it should break existing m68k emulation... > > > > > > Bryce, you should only post your patches, refering to the repository on > > > which they apply, i.e. git://gitorious.org/qemu-m68k/qemu-m68k.git , > > > master branch. > > > > > > > Btw, are you planning on merging it back someday? > > > > Yes... when it will work correctly. > > I have at least, to rework 680x0 FPU part (80bit fpu) to not break the > existing one (64bit fpu). > I have to check modified instructions don't break existing m68k emulation. Maybe Bryce can help you > Currently, I'm trying to port some parts of BasiliskII into Qemu to be able > to boot MacOS 7.6. Why are you planning to port a hack instead of making a full machine emulation? > Regards, > Laurent
