Hi,

This is a followup to a previous cleanup for the sPAPR code:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg04860.html

The last two patches had to be dropped because they were wrongly assuming
that object_property_get_uint() returning zero meant failure. This led to
a discussion in which arose a consensus that most of the time (not to say
always) object property getters should never fail actually, ie. failure
is very likely the result of a programming error and QEMU should abort.

This series aims at demonstrating a revelant case I've found while auditing
object property getters (this is patch 4 that I've isolated from a huge
50-patch series I haven't dared to post yet). The sPAPR memory hotplug code
is tailored to support either regular PC DIMMs or NVDIMMs, which inherit
from PC DIMMs. They expect to get some properties from the DIMM object,
which happens to be set by default at the PC DIMM class level. It thus
doesn't make sense to pass an error object and propagate it when getting
them since this would lure the user into thinking they did something wrong.

Some preliminary cleanup is done on the way, especially dropping an unused
@errp argument of pc_dimm_plug(). This affects several platforms other than
sPAPR but I guess the patch is trivial enough to go through David's tree
if it gets acks from the relevant maintainers.

---

Greg Kurz (5):
      pc-dimm: Drop @errp argument of pc_dimm_plug()
      spapr: Use appropriate getter for PC_DIMM_ADDR_PROP
      spapr: Use appropriate getter for PC_DIMM_SLOT_PROP
      spapr: Pass &error_abort when getting some PC DIMM properties
      spapr: Simplify error handling in spapr_memory_plug()


 hw/arm/virt.c                 |    9 +-------
 hw/i386/pc.c                  |    8 +------
 hw/mem/pc-dimm.c              |    2 +-
 hw/ppc/spapr.c                |   48 +++++++++++++++--------------------------
 hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c         |    5 +++-
 include/hw/mem/pc-dimm.h      |    2 +-
 include/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h |    2 +-
 7 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

--
Greg


Reply via email to