On 26/10/20 16:33, Joelle van Dyne wrote: > Just to be clear, you're in favor of removing the > --enable-cross-compile option? I can do that if others agree but I'm > not sure what the downside of adding this extra option is?
For me the downside is that it's not clear that --cross-prefix=foo- implies --enable-cross-compile. Paolo > -j > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:54 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 25/10/20 20:24, Joelle van Dyne wrote: >>> As the patch stands --cross-prefix="" works but I like having the >>> --enable-cross-compile option because it's more clear of the intention >>> (in logs and such). I've been struggling to come up with a concise >>> modification to the help text for --cross-prefix that explains that >>> empty PREFIX is allowed and why you would want to do that. >> >> --cross-prefix=PREFIX enable cross compilation, using PREFIX >> in front of compile tools >> >> Paolo >> >
