Hi Philippe, On 10/26/20 11:55 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > In preparation of using multiple IRQs, switch to using the recently > introduced MSIX API. Instead of allocating and assigning IRQ in > a single step, we now have to use two distinct calls. > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> > --- > block/nvme.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c > index 46b09b3a3a7..191678540b6 100644 > --- a/block/nvme.c > +++ b/block/nvme.c > @@ -693,6 +693,7 @@ static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char > *device, int namespace, > size_t device_page_size_min; > size_t device_page_size_max; > size_t iommu_page_size_min = 4096; > + unsigned irq_count = MSIX_IRQ_COUNT; > > qemu_co_mutex_init(&s->dma_map_lock); > qemu_co_queue_init(&s->dma_flush_queue); > @@ -809,8 +810,17 @@ static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char > *device, int namespace, > } > } > > - ret = qemu_vfio_pci_init_irq(s->vfio, s->irq_notifier, > - VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX, errp); > + ret = qemu_vfio_pci_msix_init_irqs(s->vfio, &irq_count, errp); > + if (ret) { > + if (ret == -EOVERFLOW) { > + error_append_hint(errp, "%u IRQs requested but only %u > available\n", > + MSIX_IRQ_COUNT, irq_count); This message can be directly printed in qemu_vfio_pci_msix_init_irqs() > + } > + goto out; > + } > + > + ret = qemu_vfio_pci_msix_set_irq(s->vfio, MSIX_SHARED_IRQ_IDX, > + s->irq_notifier, errp); > if (ret) { > goto out; > } > Thanks
Eric