On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:55:43AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> When accessing an SPE instruction despite it being not available,
> throw an SPE exception instead of an APU exception. That way the
> guest knows what's going on and actually uses SPE.
>
> Reported-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wes...@windriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
> ---
> target-ppc/translate.c | 78
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
> index fd7c208..f36363a 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/translate.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
> @@ -6622,7 +6622,7 @@ static inline void gen_evmra(DisasContext *ctx)
> {
>
> if (unlikely(!ctx->spe_enabled)) {
> - gen_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_APU);
> + gen_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_SPEU);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -6693,7 +6693,7 @@ static inline void gen_speundef(DisasContext *ctx)
> static inline void gen_##name(DisasContext *ctx)
> \
> {
> \
> if (unlikely(!ctx->spe_enabled)) {
> \
> - gen_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_APU);
> \
> + gen_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_SPEU);
> \
^^
I've applied this (with a minor whitespace change), thanks Alex.
Cheers
