Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> writes: > On 11/6/20 7:33 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: [...] >> In other words "%" PRIu32 is just a less legible alias for "%u" in all >> cases that matter. > > Can we add a checkpatch rule to avoid using 'PRI[dux]32' format, > so it is clear for everyone?
I guess we could, but *I* can't: -ENOTIME, sorry.
