On 08/25/2011 04:19 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > However, I don't like it either, and prefer the > __attribute__(((((((gcc_fields)))))) as well.Could someone with a Windows environment test if that (or (packed, gcc_fields)?) makes struct { unsigned char a; unsigned int b; }; truly packed again?
You'll need both attributes IIUC. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.
