Re: [PATCH-for-5.2 4/4] migration/ram: Fix hexadecimal format string specifier

[Dr. David Alan Gilbert]

* Dr. David Alan Gilbert (dgilb...@redhat.com) wrote:
> * Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (phi...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Hi David, Juan.
> > 
> > On 11/3/20 1:46 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (phi...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >> The '%u' conversion specifier is for decimal notation.
> > >> When prefixing a format with '0x', we want the hexadecimal
> > >> specifier ('%x').
> > >>
> > >> Inspired-by: Dov Murik <dovmu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > As there is no qemu-trivial@ pull request during freeze/rc,
> > can you queue this patch via your migration tree?
> 
> Yep, will do.

Queued

> Dave
> 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Phil.
> > 
> > > 
> > >> ---
> > >>  migration/ram.c | 2 +-
> > >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> > >> index 2da2b622ab2..23dcfb3ac38 100644
> > >> --- a/migration/ram.c
> > >> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> > >> @@ -3729,7 +3729,7 @@ int ram_dirty_bitmap_reload(MigrationState *s, 
> > >> RAMBlock *block)
> > >>      }
> > >>  
> > >>      if (end_mark != RAMBLOCK_RECV_BITMAP_ENDING) {
> > >> -        error_report("%s: ramblock '%s' end mark incorrect: 0x%"PRIu64,
> > >> +        error_report("%s: ramblock '%s' end mark incorrect: 0x%"PRIx64,
> > >>                       __func__, block->idstr, end_mark);
> > >>          ret = -EINVAL;
> > >>          goto out;
> > >> -- 
> > >> 2.26.2
> > >>
> > 
> -- 
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
> 
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK