On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:34:22PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote: > This series was largely built on the assumption that IPI numbers are > numerically equal to vCPU ids. Even if this happens to be the case > in practice with the default machine settings, this ceases to be true > if VSMT is set to a different value than the number of vCPUs per core. > This causes bogus IPI numbers to be created in KVM from a guest stand > point. This leads to unknow results in the guest, including crashes > or missing vCPUs (see BugLink) and even non-fatal oopses in current > KVM that lacks a check before accessing misconfigured HW (see [1]). > > A tentative patch was sent (see [2]) but it seems too complex to be > merged in an RC. Since the original changes are essentially an > optimization, it seems safer to revert them for now. The damage is > done by commit acbdb9956fe9 ("spapr/xive: Allocate IPIs independently > from the other sources") but the previous patches in the series are > really preparatory patches. So this reverts the whole series: > > eab0a2d06e97 ("spapr/xive: Allocate vCPU IPIs from the vCPU contexts") > acbdb9956fe9 ("spapr/xive: Allocate IPIs independently from the other > sources") > fa94447a2cd6 ("spapr/xive: Use kvmppc_xive_source_reset() in post_load") > 235d3b116213 ("spapr/xive: Modify kvm_cpu_is_enabled() interface") > > [1] https://marc.info/?l=kvm-ppc&m=160458409722959&w=4 > [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-11/msg03626.html > > Reported-by: Satheesh Rajendran <sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Fixes: acbdb9956fe9 ("spapr/xive: Allocate IPIs independently from the other > sources") > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1900241 > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> > --- > > Peter, > > I'm Cc'ing you because we really want to fix this regression in 5.2. > Reverting the culprit optimization seems a lot safer than the changes > proposed in my other patch. David is on PTO right now and I'm not sure > if he can post a PR anytime soon. Just in case: would it be acceptable > to you if I send a PR after it got some positive feedback from the > people on the Cc: list ? The better the sooner or do we wait for David > to get a chance to step in ?
I am indeed on holiday, and I'm not going to review this until next week. I trust Greg's judgement, though, so I'm happy for this to be applied directly. > --- > hw/intc/spapr_xive_kvm.c | 102 > ++++++++-------------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive_kvm.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive_kvm.c > index 66bf4c06fe55..e8667ce5f621 100644 > --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive_kvm.c > +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive_kvm.c > @@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ typedef struct KVMEnabledCPU { > static QLIST_HEAD(, KVMEnabledCPU) > kvm_enabled_cpus = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(&kvm_enabled_cpus); > > -static bool kvm_cpu_is_enabled(unsigned long vcpu_id) > +static bool kvm_cpu_is_enabled(CPUState *cs) > { > KVMEnabledCPU *enabled_cpu; > + unsigned long vcpu_id = kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cs); > > QLIST_FOREACH(enabled_cpu, &kvm_enabled_cpus, node) { > if (enabled_cpu->vcpu_id == vcpu_id) { > @@ -146,45 +147,6 @@ int kvmppc_xive_cpu_synchronize_state(XiveTCTX *tctx, > Error **errp) > return s.ret; > } > > -/* > - * Allocate the vCPU IPIs from the vCPU context. This will allocate > - * the XIVE IPI interrupt on the chip on which the vCPU is running. > - * This gives a better distribution of IPIs when the guest has a lot > - * of vCPUs. When the vCPUs are pinned, this will make the IPI local > - * to the chip of the vCPU. It will reduce rerouting between interrupt > - * controllers and gives better performance. > - */ > -typedef struct { > - SpaprXive *xive; > - Error *err; > - int rc; > -} XiveInitIPI; > - > -static void kvmppc_xive_reset_ipi_on_cpu(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data arg) > -{ > - unsigned long ipi = kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cs); > - XiveInitIPI *s = arg.host_ptr; > - uint64_t state = 0; > - > - s->rc = kvm_device_access(s->xive->fd, KVM_DEV_XIVE_GRP_SOURCE, ipi, > - &state, true, &s->err); > -} > - > -static int kvmppc_xive_reset_ipi(SpaprXive *xive, CPUState *cs, Error **errp) > -{ > - XiveInitIPI s = { > - .xive = xive, > - .err = NULL, > - .rc = 0, > - }; > - > - run_on_cpu(cs, kvmppc_xive_reset_ipi_on_cpu, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(&s)); > - if (s.err) { > - error_propagate(errp, s.err); > - } > - return s.rc; > -} > - > int kvmppc_xive_cpu_connect(XiveTCTX *tctx, Error **errp) > { > ERRP_GUARD(); > @@ -195,7 +157,7 @@ int kvmppc_xive_cpu_connect(XiveTCTX *tctx, Error **errp) > assert(xive->fd != -1); > > /* Check if CPU was hot unplugged and replugged. */ > - if (kvm_cpu_is_enabled(kvm_arch_vcpu_id(tctx->cs))) { > + if (kvm_cpu_is_enabled(tctx->cs)) { > return 0; > } > > @@ -214,12 +176,6 @@ int kvmppc_xive_cpu_connect(XiveTCTX *tctx, Error **errp) > return ret; > } > > - /* Create/reset the vCPU IPI */ > - ret = kvmppc_xive_reset_ipi(xive, tctx->cs, errp); > - if (ret < 0) { > - return ret; > - } > - > kvm_cpu_enable(tctx->cs); > return 0; > } > @@ -279,12 +235,6 @@ int kvmppc_xive_source_reset_one(XiveSource *xsrc, int > srcno, Error **errp) > > assert(xive->fd != -1); > > - /* > - * The vCPU IPIs are now allocated in kvmppc_xive_cpu_connect() > - * and not with all sources in kvmppc_xive_source_reset() > - */ > - assert(srcno >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); > - > if (xive_source_irq_is_lsi(xsrc, srcno)) { > state |= KVM_XIVE_LEVEL_SENSITIVE; > if (xsrc->status[srcno] & XIVE_STATUS_ASSERTED) { > @@ -296,28 +246,12 @@ int kvmppc_xive_source_reset_one(XiveSource *xsrc, int > srcno, Error **errp) > true, errp); > } > > -/* > - * To be valid, a source must have been claimed by the machine (valid > - * entry in the EAS table) and if it is a vCPU IPI, the vCPU should > - * have been enabled, which means the IPI has been allocated in > - * kvmppc_xive_cpu_connect(). > - */ > -static bool xive_source_is_valid(SpaprXive *xive, int i) > -{ > - return xive_eas_is_valid(&xive->eat[i]) && > - (i >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE || kvm_cpu_is_enabled(i)); > -} > - > static int kvmppc_xive_source_reset(XiveSource *xsrc, Error **errp) > { > SpaprXive *xive = SPAPR_XIVE(xsrc->xive); > int i; > > - /* > - * Skip the vCPU IPIs. These are created/reset when the vCPUs are > - * connected in kvmppc_xive_cpu_connect() > - */ > - for (i = SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE; i < xsrc->nr_irqs; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < xsrc->nr_irqs; i++) { > int ret; > > if (!xive_eas_is_valid(&xive->eat[i])) { > @@ -399,7 +333,7 @@ static void kvmppc_xive_source_get_state(XiveSource *xsrc) > for (i = 0; i < xsrc->nr_irqs; i++) { > uint8_t pq; > > - if (!xive_source_is_valid(xive, i)) { > + if (!xive_eas_is_valid(&xive->eat[i])) { > continue; > } > > @@ -582,7 +516,7 @@ static void kvmppc_xive_change_state_handler(void > *opaque, int running, > uint8_t pq; > uint8_t old_pq; > > - if (!xive_source_is_valid(xive, i)) { > + if (!xive_eas_is_valid(&xive->eat[i])) { > continue; > } > > @@ -610,7 +544,7 @@ static void kvmppc_xive_change_state_handler(void > *opaque, int running, > for (i = 0; i < xsrc->nr_irqs; i++) { > uint8_t pq; > > - if (!xive_source_is_valid(xive, i)) { > + if (!xive_eas_is_valid(&xive->eat[i])) { > continue; > } > > @@ -713,22 +647,22 @@ int kvmppc_xive_post_load(SpaprXive *xive, int > version_id) > } > } > > - /* > - * We can only restore the source config if the source has been > - * previously set in KVM. Since we don't do that at reset time > - * when restoring a VM, let's do it now. > - */ > - ret = kvmppc_xive_source_reset(&xive->source, &local_err); > - if (ret < 0) { > - goto fail; > - } > - > /* Restore the EAT */ > for (i = 0; i < xive->nr_irqs; i++) { > - if (!xive_source_is_valid(xive, i)) { > + if (!xive_eas_is_valid(&xive->eat[i])) { > continue; > } > > + /* > + * We can only restore the source config if the source has been > + * previously set in KVM. Since we don't do that for all interrupts > + * at reset time anymore, let's do it now. > + */ > + ret = kvmppc_xive_source_reset_one(&xive->source, i, &local_err); > + if (ret < 0) { > + goto fail; > + } > + > ret = kvmppc_xive_set_source_config(xive, i, &xive->eat[i], > &local_err); > if (ret < 0) { > goto fail; > > -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature