On 12/11/20 5:44 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/11/20 2:31 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfont...@suse.de>
>> ---
>>  target/i386/cpu.h             |  97 ++---------------------------
>>  target/i386/tcg/helper-tcg.h  | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.h     |  15 +++++
>>  target/i386/cpu.c             |  33 ++++------
>>  target/i386/helper.c          |  23 -------
>>  target/i386/tcg/bpt_helper.c  |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/cc_helper.c   |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/excp_helper.c |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/fpu_helper.c  |  33 +++++-----
>>  target/i386/tcg/int_helper.c  |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/mem_helper.c  |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/misc_helper.c |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/mpx_helper.c  |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/seg_helper.c  |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/smm_helper.c  |   2 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/svm_helper.c  |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.c     |  71 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  target/i386/tcg/translate.c   |   1 +
>>  target/i386/tcg/meson.build   |   1 +
>>  19 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 target/i386/tcg/helper-tcg.h
>>  create mode 100644 target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.h
>>  create mode 100644 target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> 
> This is doing a lot more than $SUBJECT, which afaict would just be the 
> creation
> of target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.c.
> 
>> +#define CC_DST  (env->cc_dst)
>> +#define CC_SRC  (env->cc_src)
>> +#define CC_SRC2 (env->cc_src2)
>> +#define CC_OP   (env->cc_op)
> 
> Why are these moving within cpu.h?  If they move at all, they should be moved
> out of here.  Better if they're simply removed -- this is a silly wrapping of
> "env->foo" from ancient days.
> 
>> +/* float macros */
>> +#define FT0    (env->ft0)
>> +#define ST0    (env->fpregs[env->fpstt].d)
>> +#define ST(n)  (env->fpregs[(env->fpstt + (n)) & 7].d)
>> +#define ST1    ST(1)
> 
> Any chance these can move to fpu_helper.c?  Or, in the case of FT0, be 
> eliminated?
> 
>> +/* cc_helper.c */
>> +extern const uint8_t parity_table[256];
> 
> We should probably remove this and just use ctpop(x) & 1.
> 
>> +/*
>> + * NOTE: the translator must set DisasContext.cc_op to CC_OP_EFLAGS
>> + * after generating a call to a helper that uses this.
>> + */
>> +static inline void cpu_load_eflags(CPUX86State *env, int eflags,
>> +                                   int update_mask)
>> +{
>> +    CC_SRC = eflags & (CC_O | CC_S | CC_Z | CC_A | CC_P | CC_C);
>> +    CC_OP = CC_OP_EFLAGS;
>> +    env->df = 1 - (2 * ((eflags >> 10) & 1));
>> +    env->eflags = (env->eflags & ~update_mask) |
>> +        (eflags & update_mask) | 0x2;
>> +}
> 
> This is complex enough I would be in favor of moving it out-of-line somewhere
> convenient.
> 

About the above, will work on this for the next spin.

>> +++ b/target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>> +/*
>> + * i386 TCG CPU class initialization
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2020 SUSE LLC
>> + *
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
>> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef TCG_CPU_H
>> +#define TCG_CPU_H
>> +
>> +void tcg_cpu_common_class_init(CPUClass *cc);
>> +
> 
> Why does the new file need it's own header, with one declaration?

will be removed later when we have the actual classes, so this won't be needed 
anymore.

But until then, the tcg-cpu.c module exports one function to target/i386/cpu.c, 
where the tcg-specific class initialization is called.

Thanks!

Claudio

> 
> 
> r~
> 


Reply via email to