From: Chen Qun <kuhn.chen...@huawei.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
hw/ppc/ppc.c: In function ‘ppc6xx_set_irq’:
hw/ppc/ppc.c:118:16: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
118 | if (level) {
| ^
hw/ppc/ppc.c:123:9: note: here
123 | case PPC6xx_INPUT_INT:
| ^~~~
According to the discussion, a break statement needs to be added here.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.ro...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chen...@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20201116024810.2415819-7-kuhn.chen...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
hw/ppc/ppc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc.c b/hw/ppc/ppc.c
index 4a11fb1640..1b98272076 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/ppc.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/ppc.c
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ static void ppc6xx_set_irq(void *opaque, int pin, int level)
} else {
cpu_ppc_tb_stop(env);
}
+ break;
case PPC6xx_INPUT_INT:
/* Level sensitive - active high */
LOG_IRQ("%s: set the external IRQ state to %d\n",
--
2.29.2
