On 12/01/2021 19.50, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
Hi,
On 1/12/21 1:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
Let's gather the POWER-related tests in a separate file.
Did you consider having others ppc/ppc64 boot tests together too?
Some candidates:
tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxPPC64.test_pseries_tcg
tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc64_e500
tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc_g3beige
tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc_mac99
The e500, g3beige and mac99 tests are depending on the do_test_advcal_2018()
function in that file, so I think they should rather stay there.
tests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py:IbmPrep40pMachine.test_factory_firmware_and_netbsd
tests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py:IbmPrep40pMachine.test_openbios_192m
tests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py:IbmPrep40pMachine.test_openbios_and_netbsd
That's a good point, I did not notice that file when writing my patches.
Philippe, since you've created this ppc_prep_40p.py file, what do you think,
should it be merged with the other ppc tests, or shall we rather keep this
separate?
Thomas
