On 1/13/21 2:09 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Cc'ing TCI, SH4 and PA contacts FWIW. > > On 1/7/21 5:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 04:50:36PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 07/01/21 16:01, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 14:03, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Make CONFIG_TCG_INTERPRETER a Meson option, and enable TCI (though with >>>>> a warning) if the host CPU is unsupported, making it more similar to >>>>> other --enable-* options. >>>> >>>> The current behaviour is kind of deliberate. Using the TCG >>>> interpreter is a terrible idea and think it's better if we >>>> don't let users end up using it without realising that they have. >>>> (Personally I would vote to deprecate-and-delete TCI, and also >>>> to just have configure error out on unknown host CPU architectures.) >>> >>> Fair enough, I can change this back of course. The missing targets are >>> parisc, ia64 and sh4 I guess. >> >> ia64 is a dead host architecture and doesn't exist in any OS distro that >> we target anymore, so I don't think we need to consider it.
I have no opinion about ia64. >> Likewise parisc/hppa doesn't seem exist in Debian since Squeeze, so I >> think we can rule that out too. Can we please keep parisc/hppa. It's not an official platform any longer, but quite active in the "unstable" debian-ports repository: https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=hppa&suite=sid >> Only sh4 still seems to be supported in Debian. I expect the primary >> need there is for sh4 guest support rather than sh4 host support. Same as for hppa/parisc, sh4 is in debian-ports too. Helge